KR 500 R2800-2 HI vs SR22M1
Side-by-side comparison of KR 500 R2800-2 HI (KUKA Robotics) and SR22M1 (Elco Automation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- KR 500 R2800-2 HIDE
SR22M1—
Year First Available
- KR 500 R2800-2 HI—
- SR22M12026
Verified Deployments
- KR 500 R2800-2 HI0 Deployments
- SR22M10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- KR 500 R2800-2 HIACTIVE
- SR22M1ACTIVE
| KR 500 R2800-2 HIindustrial-armKUKA Robotics 15.9Trust Score | SR22M1industrial-armElco Automation 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
KR 500 R2800-2 HI vs SR22M1 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.