LARA 10 vs M1013
Side-by-side comparison of LARA 10 (NEURA Robotics) and M1013 (Doosan Robotics Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
LARA 10DE
M1013KR
Year First Available
- LARA 10—
- M10132020
Verified Deployments
- LARA 100 Deployments
- M10130 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- LARA 10$22,500
- M1013$39,900
Availability Status
- LARA 10ACTIVE
- M1013ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- LARA 1018 kg
- M1013—
Payload
- LARA 1010 kg
- M1013—
Reach
- LARA 101,000 mm
- M1013—
Degrees of Freedom
- LARA 10—
- M10136
Repeatability
- LARA 10±0.02 mm
- M1013±0.03 mm
Mounting Options
- LARA 10—
- M1013floor/table
IP Rating
- LARA 10IP54/IP66
- M1013—
Safety
Safety Rating
- LARA 10PLd 3, SIL3
- M1013ISO 10218-1, ISO/TS 15066, CE
Force/Torque Sensing
- LARA 10—
- M1013Yes
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- LARA 10—
- M10138 hrs
Programming Interface
- LARA 10visual_block, no_code_gui, proprietary_app
- M1013teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, code_python
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- LARA 10—
- M1013Yes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- LARA 10$22,500
- M1013$39,900
Warranty
- LARA 10—
- M10132 yrs
Lead Time
- LARA 10—
- M10136 wks
| LARA 10cobotNEURA Robotics 46.5Trust Score | M1013cobotDoosan Robotics Inc. —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | KR |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $22,500 | $39,900 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 18 kg | — |
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,000 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor/table |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54/IP66 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PLd 3, SIL3 | ISO 10218-1, ISO/TS 15066, CE |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | visual_block, no_code_gui, proprietary_app | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, code_python |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $22,500 | $39,900 |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 6 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month
About this comparison
LARA 10 vs M1013 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.