Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry vs xMate CR35
Side-by-side comparison of Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry (Zhejiang Grand Laser Technology Co., Ltd.) and xMate CR35 (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry—
xMate CR35CN
Year First Available
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry—
- xMate CR352025
Verified Deployments
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry0 Deployments
- xMate CR350 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry$1,000
- xMate CR35Contact for quote
Availability Status
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic IndustryACTIVE
- xMate CR35ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry6
- xMate CR356
Safety
Force/Torque Sensing
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic IndustryYes
- xMate CR35Yes
Duty Cycle
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry350A/100%/40°C (X350L), 500A/100%/40°C (X500)
- xMate CR35—
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industrydrag_and_drop, no_code_gui
- xMate CR35—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry$1,000
- xMate CR35Contact for quote
Warranty
- Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry1 yrs
- xMate CR35—
| Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic IndustrycobotZhejiang Grand Laser Technology Co., Ltd. 18.6Trust Score | xMate CR35cobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd. 34.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $1,000 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Safety | ||
| Force/Torque Sensing | Yes | Yes |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 350A/100%/40°C (X350L), 500A/100%/40°C (X500) | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | drag_and_drop, no_code_gui | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $1,000 | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Safety Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
Low MOQ High Precision Automated Collaborative Robot for Electronic Industry vs xMate CR35 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.