MiPA vs Telenoid
Side-by-side comparison of MiPA (NEURA Robotics) and Telenoid (Ishiguro Lab and ATR) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 MiPAhumanoidNEURA Robotics—Trust Score |  TelenoidhumanoidIshiguro Lab and ATR—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$9,999 | US$8,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | anthropomorphic torso |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 16 | 9 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Cloud-based AI core 'AURA' | One microcontroller (ARM7 60Hz) is embedded. An external PC is used for Telenoid control. |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | sensor_headset |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | teleoperation |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $9,999 | $8,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | work communication, education, elderly care |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Battery / Shift Runtime, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
MiPA vs Telenoid compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.