MiPA vs TURTLE
Side-by-side comparison of MiPA (NEURA Robotics) and TURTLE (Eindhoven University of Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 MiPAhumanoidNEURA Robotics—Trust Score |  TURTLEhumanoidEindhoven University of Technology10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2012 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$9,999 | US$1,500 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 15.5 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 38.2 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 3.6 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor, mild_incline |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 80 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 16 | 7 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Cloud-based AI core 'AURA' | Industrial Beckhoff PC C6920-0010, Intel® Core2™ Duo 2.0 GHz |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2.5 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.4 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | tethered |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP22 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $9,999 | $1,500 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | warehouse_transport, inspection, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
MiPA vs TURTLE compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.