Phantom 4 Pro 2.0 vs Quince
Side-by-side comparison of Phantom 4 Pro 2.0 (DJI) and Quince (Chiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
| Phantom 4 Pro 2.0deliveryDJI 13.3Trust Score | QuincedeliveryChiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University 10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $1,500 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $1,500 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Payload, Robot Weight, Dimensions, Tray Count, Tray Capacity, Compartment Type, IP Rating, Navigation Type, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Charge Time, Auto Docking, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Noise Level, Display Size, RaaS / Month, Warranty
About this comparison
Phantom 4 Pro 2.0 vs Quince compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.