Philip K. Dick Android vs Toyota Partner Robot
Side-by-side comparison of Philip K. Dick Android (Hanson Robotics) and Toyota Partner Robot (Toyota) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Philip K. Dick AndroidhumanoidHanson Robotics10.0Trust Score |  Toyota Partner RobothumanoidToyota—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Hong Kong | JP |
| Year First Available | 2005 | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | 0.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1905 mm | 1480 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 80 kg | 1 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | android | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 28 | 31 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson AGX | Intel-based computer |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teach_pendant | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | 0.5 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teach_pendant | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | entertainment, robotics | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Philip K. Dick Android vs Toyota Partner Robot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.