QUICKLOCK vs Ti5_Arm_Series
Side-by-side comparison of QUICKLOCK (Rausch) and Ti5_Arm_Series (钛虎科技) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 QUICKLOCKcobotRausch40.1Trust Score | Ti5_Arm_Seriescobot钛虎科技 10.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 12.5 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, wall, fork, handlebar | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | NSF/ANSI Standard 61 certified for potable water, ASTM F3110-14 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Programming Interface, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
QUICKLOCK vs Ti5_Arm_Series compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.