Reachy Mini vs Unitree H1
Side-by-side comparison of Reachy Mini (Pollen Robotics) and Unitree H1 (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Reachy MinihumanoidPollen Robotics13.3Trust Score |  Unitree H1humanoidUnitree Robotics13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$449 | US$100,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 28 cm | 180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 1.5 kg | 47 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | static | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | anthropomorphic torso | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 3.3 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | demo only |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 10 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 6 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Raspberry 4 Compute Module | Motion Control Computing Unit (i5-1235U), Development Computing Unit (i7-1255U / i7-1265U) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Raspberry Pi CM4 | Intel i7 processors |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | api, sdk |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.9 kWh |
| Charging Method (values differ) | tethered | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | Python, C++, ROS2 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Unity, WebGL | Gazebo |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest websocket | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Noise Level (values differ) | 40 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $449 | $100,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | $299 | $27,730 |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | 3 mo | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research, teleoperation | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, RaaS / Month, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Reachy Mini vs Unitree H1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.