Oasis latent-lift AMR vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of Oasis latent-lift AMR (Shenzhen Standard Robots Co., Ltd.) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Oasis latent-lift AMRCN
TORUDE
Year First Available
- Oasis latent-lift AMR2016
- TORU2016
Verified Deployments
- Oasis latent-lift AMR0 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Oasis latent-lift AMR8 hrs
- TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
- Oasis latent-lift AMRACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- Oasis latent-lift AMR1,200 kg
- TORU95 kg
Length
- Oasis latent-lift AMR—
- TORU102.4 mm
Width
- Oasis latent-lift AMR—
- TORU66.9 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- Oasis latent-lift AMRlidar slam
- TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
Commercial
Warranty
- Oasis latent-lift AMR—
- TORU1 yrs
| Oasis latent-lift AMRamr-warehouseShenzhen Standard Robots Co., Ltd. 54.2Trust Score | TORUamr-warehouseMagazino 55.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available | 2016 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 1,200 kg | 95 kg |
| Length (values differ) | — | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 66.9 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), AMR Subtype, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Oasis latent-lift AMR vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.