TED vs Track-type chassis 100
Side-by-side comparison of TED (Naïo Technologies SAS) and Track-type chassis 100 (Zhejiang LongYu Precision Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- TEDFR
- Track-type chassis 100—
Verified Deployments
- TED0 Deployments
- Track-type chassis 1000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- TEDACTIVE
- Track-type chassis 100ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- TED600 kg
- Track-type chassis 100100 kg
Max Speed
- TED—
- Track-type chassis 1001.1 m/s
Autonomy Level
- TEDfully autonomous
- Track-type chassis 100—
| TEDagriculturalNaïo Technologies SAS 26.6Trust Score | Track-type chassis 100agriculturalZhejiang LongYu Precision Technology Co., Ltd. 0.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | FR | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 600 kg | 100 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1.1 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | fully autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, IP Rating
About this comparison
TED vs Track-type chassis 100 compares two robots in the agricultural category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.