TORU vs Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot
Side-by-side comparison of TORU (Magazino) and Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot (Zhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
TORUDE
Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR RobotCN
Year First Available
- TORU2016
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot2015
Verified Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- TORUContact for quote
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot$5,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- TORU9 hrs
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot—
Availability Status
- TORUACTIVE
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR RobotACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- TORU95 kg
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot50 kg
Length
- TORU102.4 mm
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot—
Width
- TORU66.9 mm
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR RobotMagnetic Navigation
Commercial
Price (USD)
- TORUContact for quote
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot$5,000
Warranty
- TORU1 yrs
- Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot—
| TORUamr-warehouseMagazino 55.1Trust Score | Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robotamr-warehouseZhejiang Tongzhu Technology Co., Ltd. 44.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $5,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 9 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 95 kg | 50 kg |
| Length (values differ) | 102.4 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 66.9 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) | Magnetic Navigation |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $5,000 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: AMR Subtype, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
TORU vs Tzbot Customized Qr Code Laser Slam Navigation Agv AMR Robot compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.