UR16e vs UR3e
Side-by-side comparison of UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) and UR3e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
UR16eDK
UR3eDK
Year First Available
- UR16e2019
- UR3e2018
Verified Deployments
- UR16e0 Deployments
- UR3e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- UR16eACTIVE
- UR3eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- UR16e6
- UR3e—
Mounting Options
- UR16e—
- UR3etable, workstation
Safety
Safety Rating
- UR16eCE, ISO/TS 15066
- UR3eCE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- UR16ejoint level all
- UR3ejoint level partial
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- UR16e1 hrs
- UR3e1 hrs
No-Code Capable
- UR16eYes
- UR3eYes
Programming Interface
- UR16eteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
- UR3eteach_pendant
| UR16ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) 59.1Trust Score | UR3ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) 59.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | DK | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | table, workstation |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, ISO/TS 15066 | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | joint level all | joint level partial |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time | 1 hrs | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop | teach_pendant |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
UR16e vs UR3e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.