UR16e vs xMate CR35
Side-by-side comparison of UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) and xMate CR35 (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
UR16eDK
xMate CR35CN
Year First Available
- UR16e2019
- xMate CR352025
Verified Deployments
- UR16e0 Deployments
- xMate CR350 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- UR16eACTIVE
- xMate CR35ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- UR16e6
- xMate CR356
Safety
Safety Rating
- UR16eCE, ISO/TS 15066
- xMate CR35—
Force/Torque Sensing
- UR16ejoint level all
- xMate CR35Yes
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- UR16e1 hrs
- xMate CR35—
No-Code Capable
- UR16eYes
- xMate CR35—
Programming Interface
- UR16eteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
- xMate CR35—
| UR16ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) 59.1Trust Score | xMate CR35cobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd. 34.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DK | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, ISO/TS 15066 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | joint level all | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Mounting Options, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
UR16e vs xMate CR35 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.