Are you a robotics manufacturer?
Claim your page to correct your specs and keep your listing current.
Hullbot is a robotics company founded 2017, based in Australia, developing 1 robot primarily in the Cleaning category.
Frequent autonomous hull cleaning service for lower drag and fuel use
Hullbot builds autonomous underwater robots and a frequent cleaning service that inspect, map, and clean ship hulls without drydocking or diver intervention. The company is based in Sydney, Australia and targets maritime operators seeking to reduce biofouling, fuel burn, emissions, and maintenance costs across vessel fleets.
Total funding
US$16.0M
Active products
1
Maker Score
52
Adequate evidence
View factor breakdown
Top-rated product
53.8
Robo Score
Hullbot
Company facts
- HQ
- Sydney, Australia
- Founded
- 2017 · 9 yrs
- Stage
- Series A (2025)
- Website
- www.hullbot.com
Maker Score
Products, Range, Traction set the number — the three factors present for every company. Activity, Attention, Readiness describe the brand but never move it. A value we don't have reads —, never zero. Claiming or paying moves nothing.
5 of 6 factors known. How it's calculated
Trusted by
- Sydney Ferriesforbes.com.au ↗
- NRMA Marineforbes.com.au ↗
Awards & recognition
- Australia’s Good Design Award of the Year2025dynamicbusiness.com ↗
Milestones
Company founded in Sydney, Australia.
Press coverage
- Hullbot - F6S
F6S
- Hullbot - UNSW
UNSW
Cleaning buying guides
Industry Knowledge →
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
Autonomous floor scrubber vendors compete hard on demo performance and compete poorly on SLA specificity, fleet data quality, and what happens when the machine …
Operator training: the line item most facilities skip
Cleaning robot deployments regularly underperform in year one not because the machine fails, but because operators weren't trained to get the most out of it. Th…
Cleaning robot vs. supervisor-led human team: side-by-side
The robot vs. human comparison is almost always framed by vendors as a cost question. It's not. It's a capability question first, then a cost question. Here's t…