Skip to content

Construction · companies · scores as of 25 Oct 2026 · updated 25 Oct 2026

Top Construction Companies

21 makers, ranked on their construction robots alone — not on their size, their funding, or how much of their catalogue we happen to hold. The robot standing ranks the machines themselves.

The top-ranked construction company on Robolist.ai is Brokk, with a board total of 66.73.

Close behind: COBOD at 60.66, then Hilti at 57.21.

Robolist.ai ranks 21 construction companies on their best robot, plus depth and news as of 25 Oct 2026.

Gold · #1

Brokk

66.73

best robot 58.85 + depth 5.00 + news 2.88

18 ranked construction robots

Silver · #2

COBOD

60.66

best robot 60.66 + depth 0.00 + news 0.00

1 ranked construction robot

Bronze · #3

Hilti

57.21

best robot 57.21 + depth 0.00 + news 0.00

1 ranked construction robot

#CompanyBest robotTotal
4Fastbrick Robotics1r55.5855.58
5Built Robotics1r54.4554.45
6Construction Robotics2r+1.67 depth51.6653.33
7PERI 3D Construction1r52.7752.77
8Luyten1r51.0251.02
9Dusty Robotics1r50.0650.06
10Kewazo1r49.0949.09
11Relu Robotics1r48.8048.80
12Hymaron Engineering1r48.1548.15
13Okibo1r47.9447.94
14Canvas1r47.8147.81
15Contour Crafting3r+2.64 depth44.6647.30
16Cosmic Robotics1r46.7446.74
17Xuzhou Shangheng Engineering1r45.8645.86
18Monumental1r+1.51 news42.1043.61
19Flo Mobility1r42.5442.54
20Various Manufacturers1r40.8440.84
21Jinhua Xinmai Automation1r40.3440.34
21 ranked0 changed their own score this week

At a glance · top 10

  1. 1. Brokk (Sweden) — total 66.73, 18 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 58.9.
  2. 2. COBOD (Denmark) — total 60.66, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 60.7.
  3. 3. Hilti (LI) — total 57.21, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 57.2.
  4. 4. Fastbrick Robotics (Australia) — total 55.58, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 55.6.
  5. 5. Built Robotics (United States) — total 54.45, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 54.5.
  6. 6. Construction Robotics (United States) — total 53.33, 2 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 51.7.
  7. 7. PERI 3D Construction (Germany) — total 52.77, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 52.8.
  8. 8. Luyten (Australia) — total 51.02, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 51.0.
  9. 9. Dusty Robotics (United States) — total 50.06, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 50.1.
  10. 10. Kewazo (Germany) — total 49.09, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 49.1.

How we rank

A company's total here is its best eligible robot in this category, plus capped credit for repeating it, plus news. News can only add to a rank, never subtract from one.

Which company ranks #1 for Construction?

Brokk ranks #1 for Construction as of 25 Oct 2026, on its best robot plus depth and news.

How many construction companies does Robolist.ai rank?

Robolist.ai ranks 21 construction companies as of 25 Oct 2026.

How is a company's total on the Construction board calculated?

A company's total here is its best-ranked construction robot's RoboScore — a 0-100 evidence score from structured data — plus a capped depth credit for fielding more ranked robots, plus up to 15 Momentum points from dated news, which decay over about 90 days. It is not the company's own RoboScore or RoboIndex, which are on its page. Full breakdown at /methodology.

How current is the Construction standing?

The standing ranks each robot on its newest score; the newest score on this board is from 25 Oct 2026.

A maker is ranked here on its construction robots only. Not on its global rating, and not on its size. A company that is strong in one category and weak in another ranks differently on each board — that is the point of having one board per category.

Rank = best robot, plus credit for repeating it, plus news. The evidence part is the maker's best eligible construction robot plus up to 5 points once it fields 8 of them. The credit is capped, so a large catalogue cannot buy a rank — catalogue size partly measures how much of a maker we have collected, which is our business, not theirs. Every part is printed above: the best robot, the depth credit, the news, and the total they sum to.

Deployments and funding are not in this score. Seven in ten companies have no deployment record on file and funding is blank for exactly the makers a buyer trusts most, so ranking on them would rank our own reading rather than the market. Nothing here can be bought, claimed, or subscribed to.

A maker's total here is not its RoboScore. It is its best eligible robot on this board, plus capped credit for depth, plus news. The company's own RoboScore and RoboIndex — across every category — are on its page. News can raise a rank by up to 15 points and can never lower one, so a maker with live events is ordered above one on the same evidence. Both parts are printed on the row, so a company sitting above a higher score always says why. A quiet maker keeps its full score: we have not measured silence, only failed to hear anything, and the two are not the same.

How we rank — the evidence behind every robot score these standings are built from.