Skip to content

Exoskeleton · companies · scores as of 25 Oct 2026

Top Exoskeleton Companies

37 makers, ranked on their exoskeleton robots alone — not on their size, their funding, or how much of their catalogue we happen to hold. The robot standing ranks the machines themselves.

The top-ranked exoskeleton company on Robolist.ai is Hyundai Motor, with a board total of 75.32.

Close behind: Auxivo at 65.95, then Cyberdyne at 65.62.

Robolist.ai ranks 37 exoskeleton companies on their best robot, plus depth and news as of 25 Oct 2026.

Gold · #1

Hyundai Motor

75.32

best robot 67.61 + depth 1.67 + news 6.04

2 ranked exoskeleton robots

Silver · #2

Auxivo

65.95

best robot 62.08 + depth 3.87 + news 0.00

5 ranked exoskeleton robots

Bronze · #3

Cyberdyne

65.62

best robot 61.31 + depth 4.31 + news 0.00

6 ranked exoskeleton robots

#CompanyBest robotTotal
4Comau1r+4.87 news59.0363.90
5GOGOA5r+3.87 depth58.6162.48
6SUITX4r+3.33 depth58.9162.24
7Ekso Bionics2r+1.67 depth · +3.08 news56.3661.11
8Wandercraft2r+1.67 depth · +5.71 news53.4960.87
9exoIQ3r+2.64 depth58.0660.70
10Ottobock1r59.1459.14
11Hyundai1r57.1257.12
12Bionic Power1r56.9256.92
13Japet Medical1r56.3056.30
14Roam Robotics1r54.9354.93
15ExoAtlet2r+1.67 depth52.8954.56
16Marsi Bionics3r+2.64 depth51.7754.41
17B-Temia1r54.3854.38
18WIRobotics1r53.6753.67
19Angel Robotics3r+2.64 depth · +3.73 news47.0253.39
20Verve Motion1r52.5652.56
21German Bionic2r+1.67 depth · +0.12 news50.7352.52
22Skelex2r+1.67 depth50.6152.28
23TWIICE1r51.8951.89
24PHU Technomex Sp. z o.o.1r51.8351.83
25Fourier2r+1.67 depth50.1151.78
26Bioservo1r51.1551.15
27Cionic1r50.4950.49
28UPnRIDE Robotics1r50.4750.47
29Dephy1r50.3750.37
30Carl Stahl2r+1.67 depth48.6650.33
31Laevo1r48.7948.79
32Muka Intelligent1r48.7748.77
33Wearable Robotics1r48.3548.35
34HeroWear1r47.9147.91
35Sarcos Technology and Robotics1r44.1044.10
36CUREXO1r+0.23 news41.5541.78
37Weston Robot2r+1.67 depth38.2439.91
37 ranked0 changed their own score this week

At a glance · top 10

  1. 1. Hyundai Motor (South Korea) — total 75.32, 2 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 67.6.
  2. 2. Auxivo (Switzerland) — total 65.95, 5 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 62.1.
  3. 3. Cyberdyne (Japan) — total 65.62, 6 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 61.3.
  4. 4. Comau (Italy) — total 63.90, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 59.0.
  5. 5. GOGOA (Spain) — total 62.48, 5 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 58.6.
  6. 6. SUITX (Germany) — total 62.24, 4 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 58.9.
  7. 7. Ekso Bionics (United States) — total 61.11, 2 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 56.4.
  8. 8. Wandercraft (France) — total 60.87, 2 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 53.5.
  9. 9. exoIQ (Germany) — total 60.70, 3 ranked robots, best robot RoboScore 58.1.
  10. 10. Ottobock (Germany) — total 59.14, 1 ranked robot, best robot RoboScore 59.1.

How we rank

A company's total here is its best eligible robot in this category, plus capped credit for repeating it, plus news. News can only add to a rank, never subtract from one.

Which company ranks #1 for Exoskeleton?

Hyundai Motor ranks #1 for Exoskeleton as of 25 Oct 2026, on its best robot plus depth and news.

How many exoskeleton companies does Robolist.ai rank?

Robolist.ai ranks 37 exoskeleton companies as of 25 Oct 2026.

How is a company's total on the Exoskeleton board calculated?

A company's total here is its best-ranked exoskeleton robot's RoboScore — a 0-100 evidence score from structured data — plus a capped depth credit for fielding more ranked robots, plus up to 15 Momentum points from dated news, which decay over about 90 days. It is not the company's own RoboScore or RoboIndex, which are on its page. Full breakdown at /methodology.

How current is the Exoskeleton standing?

The standing ranks each robot on its newest score; the newest score on this board is from 25 Oct 2026.

A maker is ranked here on its exoskeleton robots only. Not on its global rating, and not on its size. A company that is strong in one category and weak in another ranks differently on each board — that is the point of having one board per category.

Rank = best robot, plus credit for repeating it, plus news. The evidence part is the maker's best eligible exoskeleton robot plus up to 5 points once it fields 8 of them. The credit is capped, so a large catalogue cannot buy a rank — catalogue size partly measures how much of a maker we have collected, which is our business, not theirs. Every part is printed above: the best robot, the depth credit, the news, and the total they sum to.

Deployments and funding are not in this score. Seven in ten companies have no deployment record on file and funding is blank for exactly the makers a buyer trusts most, so ranking on them would rank our own reading rather than the market. Nothing here can be bought, claimed, or subscribed to.

A maker's total here is not its RoboScore. It is its best eligible robot on this board, plus capped credit for depth, plus news. The company's own RoboScore and RoboIndex — across every category — are on its page. News can raise a rank by up to 15 points and can never lower one, so a maker with live events is ordered above one on the same evidence. Both parts are printed on the row, so a company sitting above a higher score always says why. A quiet maker keeps its full score: we have not measured silence, only failed to hear anything, and the two are not the same.

How we rank — the evidence behind every robot score these standings are built from.