RoboScore
42.2
Out of 100. Its robots, plus proof from customers and the press.
4 of 6 measures have data
News bonus
0.9
From the last 90 days, up to 15
RoboIndex
43.1
Down 0.9 since the 12 Oct ranking
Rank change
Down 4
Now #44 of 46 in Agricultural · See the board →
Nanovel is an Israeli agtech company (founded 2018) developing an autonomous, AI-powered robot that identifies and picks ripe citrus fruit using vacuum suction and clamping blades.
Is this your company? Claim it, free. Fix your record, add videos, see who looks.
Claim NanovelMoney and customers
Raised
US$900K
Last raise · Sep 2024
Customers
None
No named customer yet
What the score is made of
How it worksThe score is 65% robots, 30% proof from customers and the press, 5% range of robots. Activity and readiness are shown for context.
Backed by
FUNDING ROUNDS AND CUSTOMERS BY ROBOT
Bigger dot = bigger round. Hollow = amount not disclosed.
Funding rounds
- Sep 2024Not yet on fileUS$900KLead not disclosedNot disclosed2 outlets ↗
Rounds recorded from January 2017. Every amount links to its source.
Suggest an editCustomers
No deployment evidence on file
A deployment is recorded when a public source names both the customer and the robot, or the maker confirms it. Nothing here counts against Nanovel.
In Agricultural, Carbon Robotics, Vitirover and GEA Group have deployment evidence on file.
Add a deployment →Active products
1
Company facts
- HQ
- Yokneam Illit, Israel
- Founded
- 2018 · 8 yrs
- Website
- www.nanovel.co.il
Active robots by Nanovel
1 shown| # | Category | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nanovel Citrus Harvesting Robot | Agricultural | 38.6 |
In the news
3 events · last 90 days
+0.9news bonus- Aug 14Inside Nanovel’s bid to crack robotic citrus harvesting
- Jul 27Nanovel Raises €2.5M EIC Grant for AI-Powered Citrus Harvesting Robots | 2026 - News and Statistics
- Jul 27Can Nanovel crack agriculture’s toughest robotics challenge?
In the news
3 events · last 90 days
Why Nanovel has been in the news, across 3 outlets, collected and classified independently, so a maker cannot add to it. It never changes a robot's RoboScore (the evidence half of the RoboIndex) and it can move a robot up a board by at most 15 points.
Safety reports
We have found no public register covering this maker’s home market that we can read. A blank record here is an absence of disclosure, not an absence of incidents, and should not be read as a clean history.
Agricultural buying guides
Industry Knowledge →
Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms
Most agricultural robot procurement decisions optimize for demo quality and sticker price. The farms that make durable vendor choices optimize for data transpar…
From Research Plot to Commercial Scale: A Two-Season Playbook
Most ag robot programs fail not in the technology lab but in the transition from controlled trial to commercial operation. The farms that navigate it successful…
Field Constraints That Kill Robot Deployments: Terrain, Weather, Crop Spacing
Slope gradients, seasonal mud windows, crop-row geometry, and end-of-row headland length are the four variables that most reliably predict whether an ag robot d…
People also compare
- Applied Carbon43.3RoboIndexCompare Nanovel vs Applied Carbon
- Jining Xugong Construction42.9RoboIndexCompare Nanovel vs Jining Xugong Construction
- XMobots43.5RoboIndexCompare Nanovel vs XMobots