1X NEO Beta vs Archie
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and Archie (University of Manitoba) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
1X NEO BetaUS
Archie—
Year First Available
- 1X NEO Beta2024
- Archie2004
Verified Deployments
- 1X NEO Beta0 Deployments
- Archie0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- Archie$3,320
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- Archie—
Availability Status
- 1X NEO BetaACTIVE
- ArchieACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- 1X NEO Beta29.9 kg
- Archie—
Height
- 1X NEO Beta1676 mm
- Archie813 mm
Humanoid Subtype
- 1X NEO Betabipedal
- Archie—
Walking Speed
- 1X NEO Beta3.4 m/s
- Archie1,000 m/s
Terrain
- 1X NEO Betaindoor
- Archieindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 1X NEO Beta25 kg
- Archie—
Total DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- Archie—
Arm DOF
- 1X NEO Beta—
- Archie3
Hand DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- Archie—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 1X NEO BetaNVIDIA Robotics Platform
- Archie—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- Archie—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- Archie$3,320
Price Tier
- 1X NEO Beta20-40K
- Archie20-40K
Pricing Model
- 1X NEO Betapurchase
- Archiepurchase
Applications
- 1X NEO Betaeldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
- ArchieRoboCup Humanoid League competitions; supporting humans in everyday life (design goal).[1][2][5][6]
| 1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | ArchiehumanoidUniversity of Manitoba 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2004 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $3,320 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | 813 mm |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | 1,000 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $3,320 |
| Price Tier | 20-40K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | RoboCup Humanoid League competitions; supporting humans in everyday life (design goal).[1][2][5][6] |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs Archie compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.