1X NEO Beta vs Manav
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and Manav (Unknown) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
1X NEO BetaUS
Manav—
Year First Available
- 1X NEO Beta2024
- Manav—
Verified Deployments
- 1X NEO Beta0 Deployments
- Manav0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- Manav$29
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- Manav8 hrs
Availability Status
- 1X NEO BetaACTIVE
- ManavACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- 1X NEO Beta1676 mm
- Manav1600 mm
Weight
- 1X NEO Beta29.9 kg
- Manav67.5 kg
Humanoid Subtype
- 1X NEO Betabipedal
- Manav—
Walking Speed
- 1X NEO Beta3.4 m/s
- Manav2 m/s
Terrain
- 1X NEO Betaindoor
- Manavindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 1X NEO Beta25 kg
- Manav10 kg
Total DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- Manav42
Hand DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- Manav—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 1X NEO BetaNVIDIA Robotics Platform
- ManavDual 8-core CPUs (~100 TOPS AI Throughput)
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- Manav8 hrs
Reliability
IP Rating
- 1X NEO Beta—
- ManavIPX5
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- Manav$29
Price Tier
- 1X NEO Beta20-40K
- Manav10-20K
Pricing Model
- 1X NEO Betapurchase
- Manav—
Warranty
- 1X NEO Beta—
- Manav1 yrs
Applications
- 1X NEO Betaeldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
- Manavhospitality, eldercare_assistance
| 1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | ManavhumanoidUnknown 37.2Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $29 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | 1600 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 67.5 kg |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 42 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | Dual 8-core CPUs (~100 TOPS AI Throughput) |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | IPX5 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $29 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | hospitality, eldercare_assistance |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs Manav compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.