1X NEO Beta vs QTrobot RD-V2 i5
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and QTrobot RD-V2 i5 (LuxAI) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
1X NEO BetaUS
QTrobot RD-V2 i5LU
Year First Available
- 1X NEO Beta2024
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Verified Deployments
- 1X NEO Beta0 Deployments
- QTrobot RD-V2 i50 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5$11,900
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Availability Status
- 1X NEO BetaACTIVE
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- 1X NEO Beta1676 mm
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Weight
- 1X NEO Beta29.9 kg
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Mobility Type
- 1X NEO Beta—
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5static
Humanoid Subtype
- 1X NEO Betabipedal
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5anthropomorphic torso
Walking Speed
- 1X NEO Beta3.4 m/s
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Terrain
- 1X NEO Betaindoor
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 1X NEO Beta25 kg
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Total DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Hand DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 1X NEO BetaNVIDIA Robotics Platform
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5$11,900
Price Tier
- 1X NEO Beta20-40K
- QTrobot RD-V2 i510-20K
Pricing Model
- 1X NEO Betapurchase
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5capex
Developer Unit Price
- 1X NEO Beta—
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5$11,900
Applications
- 1X NEO Betaeldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
- QTrobot RD-V2 i5research
| 1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | QTrobot RD-V2 i5humanoidLuxAI 34.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | LU |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $11,900 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $11,900 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $11,900 |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs QTrobot RD-V2 i5 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.