1X NEO Beta vs TORO
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and TORO (DLR) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
1X NEO BetaUS
TORODE
Year First Available
1X NEO Beta2024
TORO2013
Verified Deployments
1X NEO Beta0 Deployments
TORO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
1X NEO Beta$20,000
TOROContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
1X NEO Beta3 hrs
TORO1 hrs
Availability Status
1X NEO BetaACTIVE
TOROACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
1X NEO Beta29.9 kg
TORO—
Height
1X NEO Beta1676 mm
TORO—
Humanoid Subtype
1X NEO Betabipedal
TORO—
Walking Speed
1X NEO Beta3.4 m/s
TORO—
Terrain
1X NEO Betaindoor
TORO—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
1X NEO Beta25 kg
TORO—
Total DOF
1X NEO Beta22
TORO—
Hand DOF
1X NEO Beta22
TORO—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
1X NEO BetaNVIDIA Robotics Platform
TORO—
Battery & Power
Runtime
1X NEO Beta3 hrs
TORO—
Commercial
Price (USD)
1X NEO Beta$20,000
TOROContact for quote
Price Tier
1X NEO Beta20-40K
TORO—
Pricing Model
1X NEO Betapurchase
TORO—
Applications
1X NEO Betaeldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
TORO—
1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | TOROhumanoidDLR46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs TORO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.