NEO vs KUAVO 3.0
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS—Trust Score |  KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$20,000 | US$30,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 1750 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 60 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 4.6 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 30 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 41 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 14 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | Embedded platform with KaihongOS |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $30,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 30-40K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | teleoperation | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs KUAVO 3.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.