3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot (SIASUN) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile RobotCN
- TORUDE
Year First Available
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot2009
- TORU2016
Verified Deployments
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot0 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot—
- TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile RobotACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot120,000 kg
- TORU95 kg
Length
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot—
- TORU102.4 mm
Width
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot—
- TORU66.9 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robotlidar slam,magnetic tape,color tape
- TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
Commercial
Warranty
- 3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot—
- TORU1 yrs
48.8Trust Score | 55.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 120,000 kg | 95 kg |
| Length (values differ) | — | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 66.9 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,magnetic tape,color tape | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), AMR Subtype, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
3T Heavy-Duty Mobile Robot vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.