ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS vs PD400UR
Side-by-side comparison of ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS (DAIHEN) and PD400UR (Nitto Seiko America) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Year First Available
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS—
- PD400UR2021
Verified Deployments
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS0 Deployments
- PD400UR0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NSACTIVE
- PD400URACTIVE
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS—
- PD400URSD600T Series NX Driver
Teach Pendant Type
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS—
- PD400URwired touch
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS—
- PD400URISO 9409-1-50-4-M6
Commercial
Service Network
- ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS—
- PD400URregional
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2021 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | SD600T Series NX Driver |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired touch |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1-50-4-M6 |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS and PD400UR?
ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS is made by DAIHEN. PD400UR is made by Nitto Seiko America.
How do ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS and PD400UR compare on the Robolist Product Score?
ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS scores 0/100. PD400UR scores 19/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS and PD400UR in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS and PD400UR?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
ACTRANS UT-AXW3000NS vs PD400UR compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.