Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2CN
NEOUSYear First Available
AGIBOT A22024
NEO2026Verified Deployments
AGIBOT A20 Deployments
NEO0 DeploymentsPrice Range (USD)
AGIBOT A2Contact for quote
NEO$20,000Battery / Shift Runtime
AGIBOT A2—
NEO4 hrsAvailability Status
AGIBOT A2ACTIVE
NEOACTIVEHeight
AGIBOT A2—
NEO1676.4 mmWeight
AGIBOT A2—
NEO29.9 kgMobility Type
AGIBOT A2—
NEObipedalHumanoid Subtype
AGIBOT A2—
NEOservice humanoidWalking Speed
AGIBOT A2—
NEO1.4 m/sTerrain
AGIBOT A2—
NEOflat_indoorPayload
AGIBOT A2—
NEO25 kgTotal DOF
AGIBOT A2—
NEO52Arm DOF
AGIBOT A2—
NEO7Hand DOF
AGIBOT A2—
NEO22Onboard Compute
AGIBOT A2—
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)Foundation Models
AGIBOT A2—
NEO1X World ModelProgramming
AGIBOT A2—
NEOvoice, mobile appRuntime
AGIBOT A2—
NEO4 hrsSDK Languages
AGIBOT A2—
NEOvoice, mobile appDeployment Maturity
AGIBOT A2—
NEOprototypePrice (USD)
AGIBOT A2Contact for quote
NEO$20,000Price Tier
AGIBOT A2—
NEO<10KPricing Model
AGIBOT A2—
NEOpurchaseWarranty
AGIBOT A2—
NEO3 yrsApplications
AGIBOT A2—
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality AGIBOT A2humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.23.0Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | — | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
AGIBOT A2 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.