AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs BellaBot
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and BellaBot (Pudu) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
BellaBotCN
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- BellaBot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBot24 hrs
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- BellaBotACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBot1290 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- BellaBot—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- BellaBot—
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBot1.2 m/s
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBotindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBot40 kg
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- BellaBot24 hrs
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- BellaBothospitality
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | BellaBothumanoidPudu 42.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 24 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1290 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 40 kg |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 24 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Weight, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs BellaBot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.