AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Humanoid robot
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Humanoid robot (Sichuan Tianchain Robot Co., Ltd. (四川天链机器人股份有限公司)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
Humanoid robotCN
Year First Available
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot2012
Verified Deployments
AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
Humanoid robot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
Humanoid robotACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot43 kg
Height
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot1600 mm
Mobility Type
AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
Humanoid robot—
Humanoid Subtype
AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
Humanoid robot—
Walking Speed
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot2.8 m/s
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot145 kg
Total DOF
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robot71
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
Humanoid robotIntelligent Interaction System
Commercial
Applications
AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
Humanoid robot—
AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.16.0Trust Score | 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2012 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 43 kg |
| Height (values differ) | — | 1600 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.8 m/s |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 145 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 71 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Intelligent Interaction System |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Terrain, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Humanoid robot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.