AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs SkyBot
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and SkyBot (Ceilix) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
SkyBotDE
Year First Available
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot2024
Verified Deployments
AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
SkyBot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot0.3 hrs
Availability Status
AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
SkyBotACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot23.2 kg
Height
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot250 mm
Mobility Type
AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
SkyBotstatic
Humanoid Subtype
AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
SkyBotservice humanoid
Terrain
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBotindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot250 kg
Battery & Power
Runtime
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBot0.3 hrs
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
SkyBotproduction pilot
Commercial
Applications
AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
SkyBotwarehouse_transport, logistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly
AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.16.0Trust Score | SkyBothumanoidCeilix46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 0.3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 23.2 kg |
| Height (values differ) | — | 250 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 250 kg |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 0.3 hrs |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | warehouse_transport, logistics_handling, manufacturing_assembly |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs SkyBot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.