A2-W vs ECCE
Side-by-side comparison of A2-W (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and ECCE (The Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 A2-WhumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  ECCEhumanoidThe Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$145,000 | US$250,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 163 mm | 1050 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 69 kg | 26 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 60 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 2 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | coordinated planning | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 275 TOPS | PC connected to a distributed microcontroller network by CAN bus or i2c |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | — |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | teleoperation |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $145,000 | $250,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | customer_service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
A2-W vs ECCE compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.