Expedition A2 vs ECCE
Side-by-side comparison of Expedition A2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and ECCE (The Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Expedition A2humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  ECCEhumanoidThe Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$145,000 | US$250,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1690 mm | 1050 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 26 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.8 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 15 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | 60 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 2 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 200 TOPS | PC connected to a distributed microcontroller network by CAN bus or i2c |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | — | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | teleoperation |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $145,000 | $250,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | $100,000–$190,000 | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | industrial automation, manufacturing, warehouse, service, reception[2][5] | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Expedition A2 vs ECCE compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.