Side-by-side comparison of Hammer 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and BenXiaoDi D30 (Fujian Hantewin Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload

Robot Weight

Dimensions

Tray Count

Compartment Type

IP Rating

Navigation Type

Max Speed

Min Passable Width

Obstacle Detection Range

Battery Runtime

Charge Time

Auto Docking

Elevator API

Fleet Management

Floor Compatibility

Noise Level

Price (USD)

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $4,600 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 910x2381x1899 | 539x478x1137 |
| Tray Count (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | — | hybrid |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP55 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | lidar slam,vision,hybrid |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | 8.3 m/s |
| Min Passable Width (values differ) | 160 cm | — |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 60 m | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Charge Time | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Auto Docking | Yes | Yes |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API | Yes | Yes |
| Fleet Management | centralized cloud | centralized cloud |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | hard floor,low pile carpet |
| UX | ||
| Noise Level (values differ) | 70 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $4,600 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Tray Capacity, Min Object Detection Height, Hot-Swap Battery, PMS / POS Integration, Display Size, RaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
Hammer 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. BenXiaoDi D30 is made by Fujian Hantewin Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
Hammer 2.0 launched in 2025. BenXiaoDi D30 launched in 2019.
Hammer 2.0 is listed at $4,980. BenXiaoDi D30 is listed at $4,600.
Hammer 2.0 scores 56/100. BenXiaoDi D30 scores 53/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Hammer 2.0 carries up to 500 kg. BenXiaoDi D30 carries up to 30 kg.
Both robots are classified as Delivery on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures
9 min readDelivery Robots
Last-Mile Delivery Pilots: 90 Days to a Decision
7 min readDelivery Robots
Indoor vs Outdoor Delivery: Why the Cost Gap Is Larger Than It Looks
7 min readDelivery Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Hammer 2.0 vs BenXiaoDi D30 compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.