Hammer 2.0 vs FL-MIKE
Side-by-side comparison of Hammer 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and FL-MIKE (Henan Foodline Machinery Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Hammer 2.0China
- FL-MIKE—
Year First Available
- Hammer 2.02025
- FL-MIKE—
Verified Deployments
- Hammer 2.00 Deployments
- FL-MIKE0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Hammer 2.0$4,980
- FL-MIKE$2,800
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Hammer 2.08 hrs
- FL-MIKE8 hrs
Availability Status
- Hammer 2.0ACTIVE
- FL-MIKEACTIVE
Physical
Payload
- Hammer 2.0500 kg
- FL-MIKE30 kg
Robot Weight
- Hammer 2.01,500 kg
- FL-MIKE43 kg
Dimensions
- Hammer 2.0910x2381x1899
- FL-MIKE—
Compartment Type
- Hammer 2.0—
- FL-MIKEopen trays
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- Hammer 2.0lidar slam,vision
- FL-MIKElidar slam,vision
Max Speed
- Hammer 2.00.3 m/s
- FL-MIKE2 m/s
Min Passable Width
- Hammer 2.0160 cm
- FL-MIKE—
Obstacle Detection Range
- Hammer 2.060 m
- FL-MIKE—
Power
Battery Runtime
- Hammer 2.08 hrs
- FL-MIKE8 hrs
Charge Time
- Hammer 2.04 hrs
- FL-MIKE5 hrs
Auto Docking
- Hammer 2.0Yes
- FL-MIKE—
Integration
Elevator API
- Hammer 2.0Yes
- FL-MIKE—
PMS / POS Integration
- Hammer 2.0—
- FL-MIKEYes
Fleet Management
- Hammer 2.0centralized cloud
- FL-MIKE—
Floor Compatibility
- Hammer 2.0hard floor
- FL-MIKEhard floor
UX
Noise Level
- Hammer 2.070 dB
- FL-MIKE—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Hammer 2.0$4,980
- FL-MIKE$2,800
Warranty
- Hammer 2.0—
- FL-MIKE3 yrs
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $2,800 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | 30 kg |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 43 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 910x2381x1899 | — |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | — | open trays |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | lidar slam,vision |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Min Passable Width (values differ) | 160 cm | — |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 60 m | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| PMS / POS Integration (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | centralized cloud | — |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | hard floor |
| UX | ||
| Noise Level (values differ) | 70 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $2,800 |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Tray Count, Tray Capacity, IP Rating, Min Object Detection Height, Hot-Swap Battery, Display Size, RaaS / Month
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Hammer 2.0 and FL-MIKE?
Hammer 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. FL-MIKE is made by Henan Foodline Machinery Co., Ltd..
How much does Hammer 2.0 cost compared to FL-MIKE?
Hammer 2.0 is listed at $4,980. FL-MIKE is listed at $2,800.
How do Hammer 2.0 and FL-MIKE compare on the Robolist Product Score?
Hammer 2.0 scores 56/100. FL-MIKE scores 46/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Hammer 2.0 and FL-MIKE?
Hammer 2.0 carries up to 500 kg. FL-MIKE carries up to 30 kg.
Are Hammer 2.0 and FL-MIKE in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Delivery on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Hammer 2.0 and FL-MIKE?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures
9 min readDelivery Robots
Last-Mile Delivery Pilots: 90 Days to a Decision
7 min readDelivery Robots
Indoor vs Outdoor Delivery: Why the Cost Gap Is Larger Than It Looks
7 min readDelivery Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
Hammer 2.0 vs FL-MIKE compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.