Hammer 2.0 vs Gita
Side-by-side comparison of Hammer 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and Gita (Piaggio Fast Forward) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Hammer 2.0China
- GitaUnited States
)
Year First Available
- Hammer 2.02025
- Gita2019
Verified Deployments
- Hammer 2.00 Deployments
- Gita0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Hammer 2.0$4,980
- Gita$2,175
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Hammer 2.08 hrs
- Gita4 hrs
Availability Status
- Hammer 2.0ACTIVE
- GitaACTIVE
Physical
Payload
- Hammer 2.0500 kg
- Gita9.1 kg
Robot Weight
- Hammer 2.01,500 kg
- Gita22.7 kg
Dimensions
- Hammer 2.0910x2381x1899
- Gita635x560x655
Compartment Type
- Hammer 2.0—
- Gitaenclosed locked
Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- Hammer 2.0lidar slam,vision
- Gitavision
Max Speed
- Hammer 2.00.3 m/s
- Gita2.7 m/s
Min Passable Width
- Hammer 2.0160 cm
- Gita—
Obstacle Detection Range
- Hammer 2.060 m
- Gita—
Power
Battery Runtime
- Hammer 2.08 hrs
- Gita4 hrs
Charge Time
- Hammer 2.04 hrs
- Gita2 hrs
Auto Docking
- Hammer 2.0Yes
- Gita—
Integration
Elevator API
- Hammer 2.0Yes
- GitaYes
Fleet Management
- Hammer 2.0centralized cloud
- Gitasingle dashboard
Floor Compatibility
- Hammer 2.0hard floor
- Gitahard floor,low pile carpet
UX
Noise Level
- Hammer 2.070 dB
- Gita—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Hammer 2.0$4,980
- Gita$2,175
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $2,175 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 9.1 kg |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 22.7 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 910x2381x1899 | 635x560x655 |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | — | enclosed locked |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | vision |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | 2.7 m/s |
| Min Passable Width (values differ) | 160 cm | — |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 60 m | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | centralized cloud | single dashboard |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | hard floor,low pile carpet |
| UX | ||
| Noise Level (values differ) | 70 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $2,175 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Tray Count, Tray Capacity, IP Rating, Min Object Detection Height, Hot-Swap Battery, PMS / POS Integration, Display Size, RaaS / Month, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Hammer 2.0 and Gita?
Hammer 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. Gita is made by Piaggio Fast Forward, based in US.
When were Hammer 2.0 and Gita launched?
Hammer 2.0 launched in 2025. Gita launched in 2019.
How much does Hammer 2.0 cost compared to Gita?
Hammer 2.0 is listed at $4,980. Gita is listed at $2,175.
How do Hammer 2.0 and Gita compare on the Robolist Product Score?
Hammer 2.0 scores 56/100. Gita scores 65/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Hammer 2.0 and Gita?
Hammer 2.0 carries up to 500 kg. Gita carries up to 9.07 kg.
Are Hammer 2.0 and Gita in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Delivery on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Hammer 2.0 and Gita?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures
9 min readDelivery Robots
Last-Mile Delivery Pilots: 90 Days to a Decision
7 min readDelivery Robots
Indoor vs Outdoor Delivery: Why the Cost Gap Is Larger Than It Looks
7 min readDelivery Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
Hammer 2.0 vs Gita compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.