Side-by-side comparison of Hammer 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and R.Bot 100 Promo (R.Bot) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Payload


Robot Weight


Dimensions


Navigation Type


Max Speed


Min Passable Width


Obstacle Detection Range


Battery Runtime


Charge Time


Auto Docking


Elevator API


Fleet Management


Floor Compatibility


Noise Level


Price (USD)


Warranty


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Russia |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 42 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 910x2381x1899 | 550x550x1050 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | — |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Min Passable Width (values differ) | 160 cm | 55 cm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 60 m | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Auto Docking | Yes | Yes |
| Integration | ||
| Elevator API (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Fleet Management (values differ) | centralized cloud | — |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | hard floor |
| UX | ||
| Noise Level (values differ) | 70 dB | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,980 | $3,000 |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Tray Count, Tray Capacity, Compartment Type, IP Rating, Min Object Detection Height, Hot-Swap Battery, PMS / POS Integration, Display Size, RaaS / Month
Frequently asked
Hammer 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. R.Bot 100 Promo is made by R.Bot, based in RU.
Hammer 2.0 launched in 2025. R.Bot 100 Promo launched in 2008.
Hammer 2.0 is listed at $4,980. R.Bot 100 Promo is listed at $3,000.
Hammer 2.0 scores 56/100. R.Bot 100 Promo scores 59/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Delivery on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Delivery Robot Vendor Selection: Insurance, Telemetry, and Fallback Procedures
9 min readDelivery Robots
Last-Mile Delivery Pilots: 90 Days to a Decision
7 min readDelivery Robots
Indoor vs Outdoor Delivery: Why the Cost Gap Is Larger Than It Looks
7 min readDelivery Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Hammer 2.0 vs R.Bot 100 Promo compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.