Alpha Ebot vs NAO V6
Side-by-side comparison of Alpha Ebot (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) and NAO V6 (RobotLAB) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Alpha EbothumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.46.4Trust Score |  NAO V6humanoidRobotLAB42.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | FR |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $850 | $16,990 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 401 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 1.8 kg | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | null | bipedal |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 16 | 25 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | RM 32-bit Cortex-A7 CPU: 900MHz | ATOM E3845 1.91 GHz, Quad core |
| Programming (values differ) | modular programming | code_python, code_c++, code_javascript, drag_and_drop |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | modular programming | code_python, code_c++, code_javascript, drag_and_drop |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $850 | $16,990 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | AI education | education, healthcare, customer_service, entertainment |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Mobility Type, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Alpha Ebot vs NAO V6 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.