Alpha1 Pro vs Nao
Side-by-side comparison of Alpha1 Pro (优必选) and Nao (Aldebaran) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Alpha1 Prohumanoid优必选—Trust Score |  NaohumanoidAldebaran—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $469 | $8,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1.6 kg | 5.4 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 40.64 cm | 580 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 0.5 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 16 | 25 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | RM 32-Bit Cortex-A7 CPU: 900MHz | Intel Atom E3845 (1.91 GHz) |
| Programming (values differ) | Blockly Coding | code_python, code_c++, low code programming |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0 kWh | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | code_python, code_c++, low code programming |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $469 | $8,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | education | education, research, healthcare, eldercare_assistance |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Alpha1 Pro vs Nao compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.