RoMan vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of RoMan (Apptronik, Inc.) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
RoManUS
NEOUS
Year First Available
RoMan2016
NEO2026
Verified Deployments
RoMan0 Deployments
NEO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
RoMan$50,000
NEO$20,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
RoMan4 hrs
NEO4 hrs
Availability Status
RoManACTIVE
NEOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
RoMan1727.2 mm
NEO1676.4 mm
Weight
RoMan72.6 kg
NEO29.9 kg
Mobility Type
RoMan—
NEObipedal
Humanoid Subtype
RoMan—
NEOservice humanoid
Walking Speed
RoMan—
NEO1.4 m/s
Terrain
RoManboth
NEOflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
RoMan25 kg
NEO25 kg
Total DOF
RoMan—
NEO52
Arm DOF
RoMan—
NEO7
Hand DOF
RoMan—
NEO22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
RoMan—
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Foundation Models
RoMan—
NEO1X World Model
Programming
RoMan—
NEOvoice, mobile app
Battery & Power
Runtime
RoMan4 hrs
NEO4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
RoMan—
NEOvoice, mobile app
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
RoMan—
NEOprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
RoMan$50,000
NEO$20,000
Price Tier
RoMan40-80K
NEO<10K
Pricing Model
RoManraas
NEOpurchase
Warranty
RoMan—
NEO3 yrs
Applications
RoManwarehouse_transport, assembly, inspection, cleaning
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
RoManhumanoidApptronik, Inc.51.5Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | US | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $50,000 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1727.2 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 72.6 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | raas | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection, cleaning | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
RoMan vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.