ARC10-1600 vs Racer-3-0.63
Side-by-side comparison of ARC10-1600 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and Racer-3-0.63 (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ARC10-1600China
- Racer-3-0.63Italy
Verified Deployments
- ARC10-16000 Deployments
- Racer-3-0.630 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- ARC10-1600$13,206
- Racer-3-0.63Contact for quote
Availability Status
- ARC10-1600ACTIVE
- Racer-3-0.63ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- ARC10-160010 kg
- Racer-3-0.633 kg
Reach
- ARC10-16001,640 mm
- Racer-3-0.63630 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- ARC10-16006
- Racer-3-0.636
Repeatability
- ARC10-1600±0.05 mm
- Racer-3-0.63±0.02 mm
Robot Weight
- ARC10-1600185 kg
- Racer-3-0.6330 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- ARC10-1600IP65
- Racer-3-0.63IP54
IP Rating (Wrist)
- ARC10-1600IP67
- Racer-3-0.63—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ARC10-1600Inclus (Contrôleur robot)
- Racer-3-0.63R1C
Teach Pendant Type
- ARC10-1600wired touch
- Racer-3-0.63wired touch
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- ARC10-1600—
- Racer-3-0.63ISO 9409-1
Internal Cable Routing
- ARC10-1600through arm and wrist
- Racer-3-0.63—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ARC10-1600$13,206
- Racer-3-0.63Contact for quote
Warranty
- ARC10-16001 yrs
- Racer-3-0.63—
Service Network
- ARC10-1600regional
- Racer-3-0.63global
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Italy |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $13,206 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 3 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,640 mm | 630 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 185 kg | 30 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | IP65 | IP54 |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | IP67 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Inclus (Contrôleur robot) | R1C |
| Teach Pendant Type | wired touch | wired touch |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | through arm and wrist | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,206 | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Service Network (values differ) | regional | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ARC10-1600 and Racer-3-0.63?
ARC10-1600 is made by EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. Racer-3-0.63 is made by Comau, based in IT.
How do ARC10-1600 and Racer-3-0.63 compare on the Robolist Product Score?
ARC10-1600 scores 58/100. Racer-3-0.63 scores 49/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of ARC10-1600 compare to Racer-3-0.63?
ARC10-1600 has a reach of 1640 mm. Racer-3-0.63 has a reach of 630 mm.
Are ARC10-1600 and Racer-3-0.63 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ARC10-1600 and Racer-3-0.63?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
ARC10-1600 vs Racer-3-0.63 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.