Archie vs ROBOTIS OP3
Side-by-side comparison of Archie (University of Manitoba) and ROBOTIS OP3 (ROBOTIS KIDSLAB) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Archie—
ROBOTIS OP3KR
Year First Available
- Archie2004
- ROBOTIS OP32017
Verified Deployments
- Archie0 Deployments
- ROBOTIS OP30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Archie$3,320
- ROBOTIS OP3$13,764
Availability Status
- ArchieACTIVE
- ROBOTIS OP3ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Archie813 mm
- ROBOTIS OP3—
Walking Speed
- Archie1,000 m/s
- ROBOTIS OP3—
Terrain
- Archieindoor
- ROBOTIS OP3—
Payload & Dexterity
Arm DOF
- Archie3
- ROBOTIS OP3—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Archie$3,320
- ROBOTIS OP3$13,764
Price Tier
- Archie20-40K
- ROBOTIS OP3150K+
Pricing Model
- Archiepurchase
- ROBOTIS OP3—
Applications
- ArchieRoboCup Humanoid League competitions; supporting humans in everyday life (design goal).[1][2][5][6]
- ROBOTIS OP3—
| ArchiehumanoidUniversity of Manitoba 27.9Trust Score | ROBOTIS OP3humanoidROBOTIS KIDSLAB 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | KR |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2004 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $3,320 | $13,764 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 813 mm | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1,000 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,320 | $13,764 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | RoboCup Humanoid League competitions; supporting humans in everyday life (design goal).[1][2][5][6] | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Weight, Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Archie vs ROBOTIS OP3 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.