Armar 6 vs MiPA
Side-by-side comparison of Armar 6 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and MiPA (NEURA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Armar 6humanoidKarlsruhe Institute of Technology10.0Trust Score |  MiPAhumanoidNEURA Robotics—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$87 | US$9,999 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1700 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.6 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 5 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 63 | 16 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 8 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Various computers for processing tasks | Cloud-based AI core 'AURA' |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $86.98 | $9,999 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Armar 6 vs MiPA compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.