Asimo vs Petman
Side-by-side comparison of Asimo (Honda) and Petman (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 AsimohumanoidHonda60.1Trust Score |  PetmanhumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)60.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2000 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $2,500,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 175 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 48 kg | 79.4 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing | production ready | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 32 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 50 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 57 | 56 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 13 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | full bimanual |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | production validated |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Three-dimensional computer processor created by Honda | Custom PC |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Honda proprietary three-dimensional processor | — |
| VLM Capable | none | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | none | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | wireless_controller | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, wireless_controller | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method | vision human | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | software_defined |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, wireless_controller | teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | — |
| Open API (values differ) | closed | limited rest |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | water and dustproof |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,500,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier | 150K+ | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | HMGMA |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, research | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Asimo vs Petman compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.