Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) vs Hubo 2
Side-by-side comparison of Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) (On-Road Technologies) and Hubo 2 (KAIST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR)humanoidOn-Road Technologies—Trust Score |  Hubo 2humanoidKAIST13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | KR |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $400,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 73.5 kg | 55 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 35.6 cm | 1250 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 100 kg | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 40 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Two PC/104 embedded computers with solid-state drives |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, teleoperation | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, teleoperation | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP 65 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $400,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | raas | purchase |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | CVG Airport, Pittsburgh International Airport, Lufthansa Innovation Hub, Posten Norge AS | — |
| Applications (values differ) | logistics_handling | robotics education, research, service robotics, disaster response |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) vs Hubo 2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.