Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) vs Pibo
Side-by-side comparison of Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) (On-Road Technologies) and Pibo (Circulus Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR)humanoidOn-Road Technologies—Trust Score |  PibohumanoidCirculus Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 73.5 kg | — |
| Height (values differ) | 35.6 cm | 250 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 100 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1.4Ghz quad-core chip |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, teleoperation | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 10 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, teleoperation | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP 65 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Model (values differ) | raas | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | CVG Airport, Pittsburgh International Airport, Lufthansa Innovation Hub, Posten Norge AS | — |
| Applications (values differ) | logistics_handling | museum interaction |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Autonomous Delivery Robot (ADR) vs Pibo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.