Ava 500 vs HT-GJ30
Side-by-side comparison of Ava 500 (iRobot Corporation (Amazon subsidiary)) and HT-GJ30 (Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Ava 500humanoidiRobot Corporation (Amazon subsidiary)—Trust Score |  HT-GJ30humanoidZhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $500 | $1,230 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 91.44 mm | 550 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 4.3 kg | 65 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 300 kg |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Mobile processor | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production scale | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $500 | $1,230 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | Lease starting at $2,000; purchase price not announced.[3] | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning | hospitality, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Ava 500 vs HT-GJ30 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.