Side-by-side comparison of BellaBot (Pudu) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
BellaBotCN
NEOUSYear First Available
BellaBot—
NEO2026Verified Deployments
BellaBot0 Deployments
NEO0 DeploymentsPrice Range (USD)
BellaBotContact for quote
NEO$20,000Battery / Shift Runtime
BellaBot24 hrs
NEO4 hrsAvailability Status
BellaBotACTIVE
NEOACTIVEHeight
BellaBot1290 mm
NEO1676.4 mmWeight
BellaBot—
NEO29.9 kgMobility Type
BellaBot—
NEObipedalHumanoid Subtype
BellaBot—
NEOservice humanoidWalking Speed
BellaBot1.2 m/s
NEO1.4 m/sTerrain
BellaBotindoor
NEOflat_indoorPayload
BellaBot40 kg
NEO25 kgTotal DOF
BellaBot—
NEO52Arm DOF
BellaBot—
NEO7Hand DOF
BellaBot—
NEO22Onboard Compute
BellaBot—
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)Foundation Models
BellaBot—
NEO1X World ModelProgramming
BellaBot—
NEOvoice, mobile appRuntime
BellaBot24 hrs
NEO4 hrsSDK Languages
BellaBot—
NEOvoice, mobile appDeployment Maturity
BellaBot—
NEOprototypePrice (USD)
BellaBotContact for quote
NEO$20,000Price Tier
BellaBot—
NEO<10KPricing Model
BellaBot—
NEOpurchaseWarranty
BellaBot—
NEO3 yrsApplications
BellaBothospitality
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality BellaBothumanoidPudu42.9Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1290 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 40 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 24 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
BellaBot vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.