Bipedal Humanoid Service Robot vs Eva
Side-by-side comparison of Bipedal Humanoid Service Robot (Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.) and Eva (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Bipedal Humanoid Service RobothumanoidShanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.10.0Trust Score |  EvahumanoidHanson Robotics10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1399 mm | 167 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 87.5 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 300 kg | 0.6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 83 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 15 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | independent |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | cloud only |
| Programming (values differ) | — | visual_block, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 12.5 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | visual_block, code_python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP20 |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | pre-order |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Bipedal Humanoid Service Robot vs Eva compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.