Side-by-side comparison of CGXi-R9 (CGXI) and CRX-10iA (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Availability Status

Repeatability

Reach

Payload

Degrees of Freedom

Safety Rating

Force/Torque Sensing

Programming Interface

Fieldbus Protocols

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available | 2022 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 620 mm | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | IATF 16949:2016 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Mounting Options, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
Frequently asked
CGXi-R9 is made by CGXI, based in CN. CRX-10iA is made by FANUC, based in JP.
CGXi-R9 launched in 2022. CRX-10iA launched in 2022.
CGXi-R9 scores 22/100. CRX-10iA scores 40/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
CGXi-R9 has a reach of 1500 mm. CRX-10iA has a reach of 1249 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
CGXi-R9 vs CRX-10iA compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.