新松移动机器人 vs Zebra Roller Series
Side-by-side comparison of 新松移动机器人 (沈阳新松机器人自动化股份有限公司) and Zebra Roller Series (Zebra Technologies) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
新松移动机器人CN
Zebra Roller SeriesUS
Verified Deployments
- 新松移动机器人0 Deployments
- Zebra Roller Series0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 新松移动机器人5.5 hrs
- Zebra Roller Series9 hrs
Availability Status
- 新松移动机器人ACTIVE
- Zebra Roller SeriesACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- 新松移动机器人2,500 kg
- Zebra Roller Series80 kg
AMR Subtype
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Seriestote shuttle
Length
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series1,000 mm
Width
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series700 mm
Min Aisle Width
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series2,600 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- 新松移动机器人lidar slam
- Zebra Roller Serieslidar slam,vision
Obstacle Detection Range
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series40 m
Pedestrian Detection
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Serieslifepo4
Opportunity Charging
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
Auto Docking
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
R15.08 Certified
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
Safety Category
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesCat.3 PLd
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series360 °
Audible Alert
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller Series100 dB
Connectivity
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- 新松移动机器人—
- Zebra Roller SeriesYes
| 新松移动机器人amr-warehouse沈阳新松机器人自动化股份有限公司 40.1Trust Score | Zebra Roller Seriesamr-warehouseZebra Technologies 49.6Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 5.5 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 2,500 kg | 80 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | tote shuttle |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,000 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 700 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 2,600 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | lidar slam,vision |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 40 m |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | lifepo4 |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Audible Alert (values differ) | — | 100 dB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Turning Radius, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
新松移动机器人 vs Zebra Roller Series compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.