行星滚柱丝杠 vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of 行星滚柱丝杠 (诺仕机器人) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
行星滚柱丝杠—
NEOUS
Year First Available
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO2026
Verified Deployments
- 行星滚柱丝杠0 Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- 行星滚柱丝杠Contact for quote
- NEO$20,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO4 hrs
Availability Status
- 行星滚柱丝杠ACTIVE
- NEOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO1676.4 mm
Weight
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO29.9 kg
Mobility Type
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEObipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- 行星滚柱丝杠灵巧手核心传动部件
- NEOservice humanoid
Walking Speed
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO1.4 m/s
Terrain
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO25 kg
Total DOF
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO52
Arm DOF
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO7
Hand DOF
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Foundation Models
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO1X World Model
Programming
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOvoice, mobile app
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOvoice, mobile app
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 行星滚柱丝杠Contact for quote
- NEO$20,000
Price Tier
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO<10K
Pricing Model
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOpurchase
Warranty
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEO3 yrs
Applications
- 行星滚柱丝杠—
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
| 行星滚柱丝杠humanoid诺仕机器人 0.0Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | 灵巧手核心传动部件 | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | — | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
行星滚柱丝杠 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.